-
Adena, M., & Myck, M. (2014). Poverty and transitions in health in later life. Social Science & Medicine, 116, 202–210.
-
Bayati, M., Akbarian, R., & Kavosi, Z. (2013). Determinants of life expectancy in Eastern Mediterranean region: a health production function. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 1(1), 57–61.
-
Blaya, J. A., Fraser, H. S., & Holt, B. (2010). E-Health technologies show promise in developing countries. Health Affairs, 29(2), 244–251.
-
Bloom, G., Standing, H., & Lloyd, R. (2008). Markets, information asymmetry and health care: Towards new social contracts. Social Science & Medicine, 66(10), 2076–2087.
-
Cole, J., Watkins, C., & Kleine, D. (2016). Health Advice from Internet Discussion Forums: How Bad Is Dangerous? JMIR. Journal of Medical Internet Research/Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(1), e4.
-
Cole-Lewis, H., & Kershaw, T. (2010). Text messaging as a tool for behavior change in disease prevention and management. Epidemiologic Reviews, 32(1), 56–69.
-
Déglise, C., Suggs, L. S., & Odermatt, P. (2012). SMS for disease control in developing countries: a systematic review of mobile health applications. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 18(5), 273–281.
-
Fayissa, B., & Gutema, P. (2005). Estimating a health production function for Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Applied Economics, 37(2), 155–1
-
Feinstein, L., Sabates, R., Anderson, T. M., Sorhaindo, A., & Hammond, C. (2006, March). What are the effects of education on health. In Measuring the effects of education on health and civic engagement: Proceedings of the Copenhagen symposium (pp. 171-354). Paris, France: OECD.
-
Gilligan, A. M., & Skrepnek, G. H. (2014). Determinants of life expectancy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Health Policy and Planning, 30(5), 624–637.
-
Hsiao, C. (2007). Panel data analysis—advantages and challenges. Test, 16(1), 1–22.
-
Jeremic, M, B., M, M., A, M., G, S., D, J., & Z, R. (2012). An Evaluation of European Countries’ Health Systems through Distance Based Analysis. PubMed.
-
Kamiya, Y. (2010). Determinants of Health in Developing Countries: Cross-Country evidence. ideas.repec.org.
-
Khatun, F., & Sima, M. R. K. (2015). Impact of ICT on health services in Bangladesh: A study on Hobiganj Adhunik Zila Sadar Hospital. Social Science Research Network.
-
Kiley, R. (2002). Does the internet harm health? BMJ. British Medical Journal, 324(7331), 238a–2238. http
-
Lewis, T., Synowiec, C., Lagomarsino, G., & Schweitzer, J. (2012). E-health in low- and middle-income countries: findings from the Center for Health Market Innovations. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 90(5), 332–340.
-
Lucas, H. (2008). Information and communications technology for future health systems in developing countries. Social Science & Medicine, 66(10), 2122–2132.
-
Majeed, M. T., & Khan, F. N. (2018). Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to health outcomes? An empirical analysis. Quality and Quantity, 53(1), 183–206.
-
Mbizi, Z. L. (2021). Investigating Effects of Implementing Information and Communication Technologies (ICTS) On Health Services in Tanzania: A Case Study of Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH).
-
Messias, E. (2003). Income inequality, illiteracy rate, and life expectancy in Brazil. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1294–1296.
-
Mostafa, R., Rahman, G. E., Hasan, G. M., Kabir, A., Rahman, A., & Ashik, S. (2010). Proposed deployments to provide E-healthcare in Bangladesh: Urban and rural perspectives. .
-
Murray, E., Lo, B., Pollack, L., Donelan, K., Catania, J., Lee, K., Zapert, K., & Turner, R. (2003). The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S.
-
Osei-Bryson, K., & Ko, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance using regression splines analysis. Information & Management, 42(1), 1–13.
-
Rambotti, S. (2015). Recalibrating the spirit level: An analysis of the interaction of income inequality and poverty and its effect on health. Social Science & Medicine, 139, 123–131.
-
Ross, C. E., & Wu, C. (1995). The links between education and health. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 719.
-
Simba, D. O. (2004). PRACTICE POINTS Application of ICT in strengthening health information systems in developing countries in the wake of globalisation. African Health Sciences, 4(3), 194-198.
-
Tsai, A. C., Mendenhall, E., Trostle, J. A., & Kawachi, I. (2017). Co-occurring epidemics, syndemics, and population health. Lancet, 389(10072), 978–982.
-
Wald, H. S., Dube, C. E., & Anthony, D. C. (2007). Untangling the Web—The impact of Internet use on health care and the physician–patient relationship. Patient Education and Counseling, 68(3), 218–224.
Abstract
The primary goal of this research is to investigate the interaction between information communication technology and health facilities. To achieve this goal, the panel data set is used from 1971 to 2020 from Pakistan's perspective. The study used pooled OLS, fixed effect estimates, and random effect approaches in its analysis. ICT is a broad topic, thus we quantified it using fixed broadband and fixed telephone subscriptions. Similarly, health is assessed using two standard proxies: life expectancy at birth and infant mortality rate.Based on time series data, the study found that information communication technology improved health outcomes significantly. Health and life expectancy will improve as technology progresses, but death rates will fall. As economic technology advances, people connect more and create healthy relationships, improving their health. Information and communication technology improve public health overall.
Key Words:
ICT; Mortality Rate; Life Expectancy; Fixed Telephone Subscriptions
Introduction
Healthy people are the most critical for enhanced and sustainable development in any economy because they are the driving force behind economic progress. The effects of information communications technology on the healthcare system in industrialized and developing countries have been the subject of much debate in recent years (Bloom and Standing 2008; Lucas 2008). However, little attention has been paid to the influence of ICT on the healthcare system in South Asia. Healthcare systems are vital for improving residents' well-being. Undeveloped healthcare systems damage the people’s social as well as the national economic perspectives. Out of 8 Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), three call for reducing neonatal mortality and enhancing reproductive healthcare services globally. Moreover, for the internal stability of any nation, healthy people play a significant role. It also reduces community loss by preventing premature deaths and chronic diseases.
The health system has improved during the past years, but still, its status differs not only across nations but within nations too. Based on World Health Organization (WHO) statistics, the average life expectancy in Japan is higher than in Malawi, in Japan, the average age of the individual is 83 years, and in Malawi, it is 47 years on average. Now, a very important question arises why are some nations or states healthier than others? Is it depending on high-income or do other factors also matter? It is commonly assumed that ‘wealthier is healthier’ but on the other hand, some developing nations like Cuba and Costa Rica with low income enjoy a very good health system. So, there is a need to examine the factors other than wealth that contribute to health. GDP growth is a major factor that affects the status of health. Other important factors are water, sanitation, urbanization (Kamiya, 2010; Bayati et al., 2013), education (Messias, 2003; Feinstein et al., 2006; Ross and Wu, 1995), Income (Prichett and Summer, 1996), environmental factors (Faysis and Gutema, 2005; Bayati et al., 2013), health care facilities (Mohan and Mirmirani, 2007; Gilligan and Skrepnek, 2014), poverty (Panye, 2000; Adena and Myck, 2014; Rambotti, 2015) and so forth include which affect the health system. Apart from these, information communications technologies are also considered to be an important factor affecting health (Khatun and Sima, 2015; Lucas Mimbi, 2015; Majeed and Khan, 2018). ICT is a unique idea that provides the best healthcare system services. Using information communication technologies in the health care system is not just about the technology but a way to achieve a range of desired results. Information communication technologies help to ensure improved treatment decision-making, safer care, and better quality. Likewise, it also provides the best responses to medical needs, info about alternate options, a heightened awareness of the health risks, and supports efficient and effective healthcare systems. ICT also aims to reinforce the system to measure the medical services in rural parts, enhancing the health service efficiency, assisting more appropriate care research, enabling collaboration, and coordination, allowing remote counseling, as well as promoting mental health service diffusion.
Numerous studies have been concentrated on assessing the role of information communication technologies in the healthcare system on organizational as well as economic levels in developed and underdeveloped nations (Osei-Bryson and Ko, 2004; Jeremic et al., 2012). Similarly, in developing nations, ICT plays a significant contribution to medical services (Chatley et al., 2006).
Health is considered one of the external dimensions of human resource development (Bankole et al., 2011). Internet facilities are likely to expedite the distribution of public services including health services to the expectant as well as the nursing mothers. Bukachi and Pukenham Walsh (2007); Bankole et al., (2013) indicate that medical workers use internet facilities for different purposes including internet collaboration, access to healthcare service information as well as communication. Information communication technologies can also assist literacy efforts, and easy access the infinite information. Therefore, it is crucial to examine the effects of information communication technologies on the execution of the nation’s health system.
The study tries to connect the links between information communication technologies and health outcomes by incorporating different proxies. It explores whether information communication technologies enhance health outcomes or not. However, there isn’t much extensive literature that exists establishing the relationship between ICT and health outcomes. So, the study contributes to the literature from this perspective. The contributions of the present study are discussed as (i) Current research attempts to explore the association between ICT and health to identify whether the technologies reduce or enhance health outcomes or not. (ii) As per our knowledge, this study is the first attempt which explore the relationship of ICT on health in 8 South-Asian economies. (iii) This study used the two basic measures of information communication technologies to capture the effect on health outcomes.
Literature Review
Several studies concentrated on the different factors that influence health (Mohan and Mirmiran, 2007; Fayissa and Gutema, 2005; Owen and Wu, 2002; Mimbi and Bankole, 2015; Khatun and Sima, 2015; Majeed and Khan, 2018). Income is observed as the main and important determinant for the improvement of health and the economy. It is widely assumed that wealthier is healthier. According to the Preston curve, people who are born in high-income or wealthier economies are supposed to have a long shelf life relative to those who are s` in poor nations. High income leads to better access to education, healthcare services, lodging, and several other factors leading to improved health, low death rates as well as high life expectancy. Pretchett and Summers, (1996) identify the impact of income on life expectancy and mortality rate, in infants and confirm the improved health status because of a rise in income. They also argue that in developing nations, the income elasticity of child mortality is -0.2 by using the technique of instrumental variable. To improve the health of the population, education plays an important role. Messias (2003) found out that income disparities and the illiteracy rate hurt life expectancy whereas GDP growth has a significant and highly positive effect on the life expectancy in Brazil. Likewise, Mohan and Mirmirani (2007) concluded that by investing in education, healthcare facilities improved. Kabir (2008) has established that the supply of physicians, undernourishment, and geographical location are the influential aspects. Moreover, the literacy rate is essential in the high-life-expectancy economies while on the other hand, medium life expectancy nations as well as low life expectancy nations might join this community by investing in education, as well as physician supply and improved nutrition. Wang (2003) focused on the impact of electricity on health in both urban and rural areas due to the increase in vaccination, there is a reduction in mortality rate also while, in the urban- sector, easy access to electricity reduces infant mortality. Kamiya (2010), factors like a rise in GDP and easy access to healthcare facilities are useful in reducing the mortality rate although other variables such as human resources, health financing, etc. are insignificant while establishing the mortality rate. Gilligan and Skrepnek (2014) explored the impact of growth on health in developed and developing nations. Their findings reveal that in developed nations, GDP growth, health spending, and literacy rate affect life expectancy and at the same time, in developing nations, vaccination rate and the physician’s intensity determine the life expectancy. Owen and Wu (2002) investigated the impact of international trade on health facilities and found out that due to the trade between economies, the mortality rate will decrease, and life expectancy will increase. They also conclude that due to health inequalities, poor economies have been enjoying more advantages than the advanced nations which leads to improved health facilities.
The literature covered several factors that influence healthcare facilities like governance, poverty, improved sanitation, GDP growth, alcohol consumption, inequality, education, access to safe water, carbon emissions, immunizations, physicians, health expenditures, employment, urbanization, and so on. However, the influence of such variables on healthcare facilities varies depending on the countries, time, different techniques, and different proxies used. As a result, a study to verify health determinants is required.
The major component that plays an important role in enhancing the healthcare system is information communication technologies. Technologies could help to improve health outcomes as well as healthcare facilities in a variety of ways. Broom (2005) investigated the association between the role of the Internet and the relationship between doctors and patients. The findings show that online information has a great impact on men’s prostate cancer. Information communication technology innovations brought challenges as well as opportunities to developing nations to strengthen and modernize the health management information system (HMIS). According to Simba and Mwangu (2004), the health management system has been restricted to domestic and regional levels, leaving most of the healthcare workers in the rural and remote zones due to weak economic policies and telecommunications infrastructure. They also advocate that developing nations have to make premeditated efforts to deal with constraints that threaten to raise the technological gap between the rural majority and the urban minorities by establishing adequate strategies and policies. Chetley et al. (2006) explored the relationship between information communication technologies and healthcare systems in developing nations and concluded that people integrate new ideas, approaches, and information by making sense of them all in terms of their local, economic, cultural, and social processes which will help them better cope with the local conditions. Wald et al., (2007) found that the population’s health can be improved by utilizing the Internet. Likewise, a net-friendly therapist can also be effective by fostering a legitimate collaboration with patients which contributes to high-quality health-care facilities. Mostafa et al. (2010) inspected the relationship between application and services, and e-health that provides both rural and urban prospects of suggested implementations to offer e–healthcare facilities in Bangladesh. It is concluded that tailored e-health-care solutions would be easily developed specifically for groups and individuals benefiting from an existing array of communication links and telemedical equipment.
In developing nations, Blaya et al., (2010) evaluated the advancement of e-health by employing information communication technologies to administer the treatment of patients. According to them, there is a positive influence of information communication technologies on e-health. They argue that technological systems enhance communication amongst institutions and expedite those patients who could abandon care. Likewise, digital equipment like mobile phones and digital assistants improved the quality and time of the data collection. Panir (2011) illustrates that due to health vulnerability and limited data sources, information communication technologies play a secondary role in accessing medical information. Déglise et al., (2012) examined SMS interventions, compliance with treatment, and surveillance in developing economies. They demonstrate that for disease prevention in developing nations, cell phones play an important role. Moreover, they claim that cell phones provide low-cost to tackle the healthcare system and provide opportunities for the betterment of the health of the population in developing nations. West (2015) investigated the association between health facilities and mobile innovations in Nigeria and found a positive and highly significant impact. Cole et al., (2016) explored the impact of internet on the health facilities. According to their findings, there seems to be little evidence of bad health data quality. Tsai et al., (2017) have examined the link between technologies and education of nurses and provide significant results. They concluded that an e-learning education system with modules of e-learning enhanced the education related to health- facilities for the nurses who work in the hospital. All the research that has been examined above uses various measures of health and information communication technologies. Few studies elaborate on the adverse impact of information communication technologies (Kiley (2002); Murray et al., (2003); Tenis et al., (2016). Mostly, we have seen the positive and highly significant impact of information communication technology on health- outcomes (Blaya et al., (2010); Lewis et al., (2012); Cole et al., (2016); Mbizi (2021).
Data and Methodology Data
We want to investigate the effect of information communication technology on health. Data which is used in our research is taken from world development indicators over time from 1971-2020. Health is our dependent and major variable which is measured through life expectancy and mortality rate in our current research. Likewise, we take ICT as our independent and focused variable. We measured ICT through two basic and common measures including fixed broadband subscription and fixed telephone subscription. Moreover, the current study used Pakistan as a sample in the whole analysis. The following table presents the variables that are included in our research.
Table 1 Variable Description and Data Sources
| Variables width="25%">Denoted by width="25%">Measured in width="25%">Sources | > Dependent Variable | > Mortality Rate width="25%">MR width="25%">Per 1000 lives birth width="25%">
| > Focused Variables | > Fixed Broadband Subscription width="25%">FBS width="25%">Per 100 people width="25%">WDI (2021) | > Fixed Telephone Subscription width="25%">FTS width="25%">Per 100 people width="25%">WDI (2021) | > Control Variables | > GDP per capita width="25%">GDPPC width="25%">Constant 2010 US dollars width="25%">WDI (2021) | > School Enrollment, Secondary width="25%">SE width="25%">Gender Parity Index width="25%">WDI (2021) | > CO2 Emissions width="25%">CO2 width="25%">Metric tons per capita width="25%">WDI (2021) | > Immunization width="25%">IMN width="25%">% of children ages 12-23 months width="25%">WDI (2021) | > Physicians width="25%">PHY width="25%">Per 1000 people width="25%">WDI (2021) | > GDP per capita width="25%">GDPPC width="25%">Constant 2010 US dollars width="25%">WDI (2021) | |||||||||
Empirical Model Specification
We employ the empirical requirements of the model in this segment. Our dependent variable is health which is measured through the two basic proxies of health including life expectancy at birth and the mortality rate. Our independent variable of the current study is information communications technology which is also measured by the two common measures, fixed broadband subscriptions, and fixed telephone subscriptions. The relation between “health and information communication technologies” can be expressed in the panel equation as follows.
Hit
= ?1GDPit +?it
+?2EDUit
+?3CO2it
+?4PHYit
+?5IMNit + ?6FBSit + ?7FTSit
Where, ‘H’ indicates health, which is measured through life expectancy and mortality rate, and GDP is the growth which is measured by per capita GDP. EDU, CO2, PHY, and IMN are the control variables used in the study and imply education, carbon dioxide emissions, physicians, and immunizations respectively. Likewise, FBS and FTS are the independent control variables which are measures of information communication technologies. FBS is fixed broadband subscriptions and FTS is fixed telephone subscriptions. We used the mortality rate to measure their health in our empirical analysis. Likewise, fixed broadband subscriptions and fixed telephone subscriptions to estimate the information communication technologies. For verifying the association between fixed broadband subscriptions and fixed telephone subscriptions on health, the following equations regressed the infant mortality rate.
MRit = (???) + ?? (???)? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + µ?? + ??t
Where MR is the mortality rate, infant, and GDP is the gross domestic product or the growth. EDU is the education which indicates the school enrollment at the secondary level of both the sexes males and females, CO2 is the carbon emissions, PHY is the physicians and IMN is represented as immunizations. Two focused variables are FBS and FTS.
Econometric Methodology
Now the conducting research study we will go into detail on the econometric techniques used in the analysis. Firstly, we applied pooled ordinary least square estimation, then the fixed and the random effect estimation to the estimated models. The Hausman test is applied to choose between the random and the fixed effect test.
Pooled OLS Method
The time series data set contains multiple degrees of freedom, and it can capture the intricacies of human behavior. Likewise, by pooling data, panel data gives precise outcomes (Hsiao, 2007). Pooled OLS is simply estimated by the OLS regression which specifies the constant coefficient and intercepts assumption. If the model is correctly estimated but independent variables do not correlate with residuals, then we can use the ordinary least square to tackle this situation. Our empirical research combines the life expectancy and mortality rate of infants in Pakistan regions with two main and common measures or proxies of information communication technologies. The equations of pooled OLS estimation mortality rate can be written as follows:
MRit = (???) + ?? (???)? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + µ?? + ??t
Additionally, error terms could be correlated with each country which leads to the autocorrelation problem in the data. The pooled OLS technique assumes the same intercept for all nations and for the cross-sectional data, slope coefficients could be the same which distorts the true picture among the dependent and the independent variables of all the states. Due to this restrictive assumption, we move to other estimation techniques including fixed effect estimation and random effect estimation.
Fixed Effect Model
The fixed effect estimation technique allows the different intercepts across the countries in which pooled OLS estimation cannot be addressed. It examined the association between dependent as well as independent variables within nations. Fixed effect estimation is also referred to as the least-square dummy variable (LSDV). The models for the fixed effect estimation can be written in the following forms.
MRit = (???) + ?? (???)? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + µ?? + ??t
In the above equations, ‘i’ indicates the different intercepts for all the nations because every country has its characteristics. While using the fixed effect technique, a multicollinearity problem may arise.
Random Effect Model
With a huge number of observations, unknown parameters will be affected in fixed effect. So, to address this issue, we used another estimation technique called random effect estimation. The primary benefit of the random effect estimation is that it includes the time-invariant variables in the analysis. This model is also referred to as the component error model which assumes that the intercept is randomly drawn from the large population. The equations of random effect estimation of mortality rate can be written as follows:
MRit = (???) + ?? (???)? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + ?? (???)?? + µ?? + ??t
The major benefit of a random effect technique is that it cannot lose the degree of freedom while estimation which we faced in the estimation of fixed effect. Moreover, it is the most appropriate method when the predicted factors correlate to the random intercept term.
The choice between Fixed and Random Effect Model
This is crucial to choose between the fixed effect and random effect estimation techniques. For this purpose, the Hausman test has been introduced in 1978. The main purpose of this test is to clarify the authenticity of fixed and random effect estimation techniques. For choosing the best test between these two, we have used the following hypothesis.
H0 = Random effect estimation is the most appropriate and consistent one.
H1 = Fixed affect estimation is the most appropriate and consistent one.
In the empirical analysis, if the null hypothesis has been rejected and the alternative hypothesis has been accepted, it implies that the results of fixed effect estimation and random effect estimation differ systematically which means fixed effect estimation is the most appropriate and valid technique rather than random effect estimation. In case we reject the alternative hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis, in this scenario, we can say that the estimation of random effect regression would be more authentic and applicable.
Result and Discussions
Table 1 shows that life expectancy is positively correlated with focused variables such as fixed broadband and fixed phone subscriptions, as well as all control variables such as per capita GDP, secondary school enrollment, carbon dioxide emissions, immunizations, and physicians. The positive correlation coefficients between focal and control factors indicate that life expectancy will rise as well. On the other side, infant mortality rates are adversely associated with all variables. It means that the negative correlation coefficients of fixed broadband subscriptions, fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita GDP, school enrollment at the secondary level, carbon dioxide emissions, immunizations, and physicians indicate that it also reduces the infant mortality rate.
Table 2 Correlation Matrix
| width="18%"> Variables width="8%">1 width="9%">2 width="9%">3 width="8%">4 width="9%">5 width="9%">6 width="8%">7 width="8%">8 width="8%">9 | > 1. width="18%">Life Expectancy width="8%">1.000 width="9%">width="9%"> width="8%"> width="9%"> width="9%"> width="8%"> width="8%"> width="8%">
| > 2. width="18%">Infant Mortality Rate width="8%">-0.91 width="9%">1.000 width="9%">width="8%"> width="9%"> width="9%"> width="8%"> width="8%"> width="8%">
| > 3. width="18%">Fixed Broadband subscription width="8%">0.737 width="9%">-0.67 width="9%">1.000 width="8%">width="9%"> width="9%"> width="8%"> width="8%"> width="8%">
| > 4. width="18%">Fixed Telephone Subscription width="8%">0.602 width="9%">-0.55 width="9%">0.277 width="8%">1.000 width="9%">width="9%"> width="8%"> width="8%"> width="8%">
| > 5. width="18%">GDP per capita width="8%">0.717 width="9%">-0.63 width="9%">0.659 width="8%">0.530 width="9%">1.000 width="9%">width="8%"> width="8%"> width="8%">
| > 6. width="18%">School Enrollment, Secondary width="8%">0.795 width="9%">-0.93 width="9%">0.636 width="8%">0.596 width="9%">0.579 width="9%">1.000 width="8%">width="8%"> width="8%">
| > 7. width="18%">CO2 Emissions width="8%">0.339 width="9%">-0.31 width="9%">0.417 width="8%">0.152 width="9%">0.714 width="9%">0.378 width="8%">1.000 width="8%">width="8%">
| > 8. width="18%">Immunization width="8%">0.855 width="9%">-0.90 width="9%">0.583 width="8%">0.312 width="9%">0.494 width="9%">0.769 width="8%">0.200 width="8%">1.000 width="8%">
| > 9. width="18%">Physicians width="8%">0.367 width="9%">-0.11 width="9%">0.410 width="8%">0.359 width="9%">0.547 width="9%">0.079 width="8%">0.547 width="8%">-0.03 width="8%">1.000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Link Test | > Model width="25%">Coefficient width="24%">T- Stats width="24%">P- Value | > Infant Mortality Rate (Dependent variable) | > Hat width="25%">0.9207 width="24%">12.96 width="24%">0.000 | > Hat- Square width="25%">0.0009 width="24%">1.15 width="24%">0.255 | > Constant width="25%">1.225109 width="24%">0.93 width="24%">0.356 | ||||||
Table 4 Pooled ordinary least square results
| Variables width="45%">(b) Mortality Rate | > Constant width="45%">123.8*** (43.24) | > Fixed width="25%">Telephone width="45%">-0.790* | > Subscription width="25%">width="45%"> (2.12) | > Fixed width="25%">Broadband width="45%">-0.344* | > Subscription width="25%">width="45%"> (1.86) | > GDP per capita width="45%">-0.00268*** | > width="45%"> (-4.94) | > School width="25%">Enrollment, width="45%">-0.642*** | > Secondary width="25%">width="45%"> (-12.83) | > CO2 Emissions width="45%">6.079*** | > width="45%"> (4.91) | > Immunization width="45%">-0.486*** class="TableParagraph">(-12.14) | > Physicians width="45%">-9.028*** class="TableParagraph">(-3.94) | > R-Square width="45%">0.9815 | > F-Statistics width="45%">462.49 | > F-Probability width="45%">0.0000 | > No of observations width="45%">69 | ||||||||||||
| Variables width="33%">Fixed Effect Model width="33%">Random Effect Model | > width="33%"> (b)Mortality rate, infant width="33%">(d)Mortality rate, infant | > Fixed Broadband Subscription width="33%">-1.268** class="TableParagraph">(3.04) width="33%">-0.790* class="TableParagraph">(2.12) | > Fixed Telephone Subscription width="33%">-0.788* class="TableParagraph">(-1.58) width="33%">-0.344* class="TableParagraph">(1.86) | > GDP per capita width="33%">-0.0167*** class="TableParagraph">(-3.91) width="33%">-0.00268*** class="TableParagraph">(-4.94) | > School Enrollment, Secondary width="33%">-0.504*** class="TableParagraph">(-6.51) width="33%">-0.642*** class="TableParagraph">(-12.83) | > CO2 Emissions width="33%">15.91*** class="TableParagraph">(3.92) width="33%">6.079*** class="TableParagraph">(4.91) | > Immunizations width="33%">-0.445*** class="TableParagraph">(-8.19) width="33%">-0.486*** class="TableParagraph">(-12.14) | > Physicians width="33%">-9.828 class="TableParagraph">(-1.92) width="33%">-9.028*** class="TableParagraph">(-3.94) | > R-Square width="33%">0.7809 width="33%">0.9815 | > Chi2(7) width="33%">------ width="33%">3237.42 | > Prob > Chi2 width="33%">------ width="33%">0.0000 | > F-Statistics width="33%">112.34 width="33%">------ | > F-Probability width="33%">0.0000 width="33%">------ | > No of Observations width="33%">69 width="33%">69 |
| Variable width="33%">Chi (5) width="33%">P-Value > Chi (5) | > Mortality Rate, Infant width="33%">-5.38 width="33%">0.0000 |
